Friday, 8 May 2015
Evaluation Q7
This is the final evaluation question to go on my blog.
'Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full product?'
'Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full product?'
Evaluation Q6
I've decided to also do this one on powerpoint to and will be embedded below.
The Question 'What have you learnt about technologies from the process of constructing this product?'
The Question 'What have you learnt about technologies from the process of constructing this product?'
Thursday, 7 May 2015
Evaluation Q4&5
These are the evaluation questions that have been filmed. I think it went well and I thought I answered the question well on the spot. The video evaluations will most probably be sent off with our final video, if not it will be posted on my blog soon.
The Questions answered were:
Who would be the audience for your media product?
and
How did you attract/address your audience?
Here also is a picture of the small planning sheet that I quickly prepared my answer for to help if I needed prompting (excuse the messy rushed handwriting):
The Questions answered were:
Who would be the audience for your media product?
and
How did you attract/address your audience?
Here also is a picture of the small planning sheet that I quickly prepared my answer for to help if I needed prompting (excuse the messy rushed handwriting):
Evaluation Q3
For this question I once again used Prezi to present it as I find it more enjoyable to use with more modern opportunities to incorporate into your work.
The question was 'How does your media product represent particular social groups?'
The question was 'How does your media product represent particular social groups?'
Update on Timeline
We in general stuck to the timeline we firstly came up with although some things changed order or happened at the same time so we have put together a true timeline on what actually happened seen as we have now completed all stages
Completed By November 30th 2014
Completed By November 30th 2014
- Initial ideas for the two minute clip
- Story Boards
- Mood Board
- Actors Chosen
- Choose A Date For Filming
- Name Chosen
- Script Complete
- Costume and prop scouting
- Filming begins
- Most of the filming complete
- Location Scouting
- All Filming Complete
- All media uploaded to a laptop
- Clip placement and organisation
- Editing process Begins
- Editing Complete
- New Filming to display the phycology behind the film
- Sound inputed on film
- New
- 2 minute clip exported
- Clip embeded onto Blogger.com
Updated Roles
After our film has been finished it was clear what roles we went with.
Me- Camera man and director
Paddy- Editing
Ben- Acting
Luke- Make-up
Me- Camera man and director
Paddy- Editing
Ben- Acting
Luke- Make-up
Wednesday, 6 May 2015
Evaluation Q2
For this question I used Prezi, for which I will insert below. I thought it was a different and interesting experience and would use this software in future.
'What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
'What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
Tuesday, 5 May 2015
Evaluation Q1
This question was
'In What ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?'
I decided to do this first one on Microsoft Powerpoint. Another question will be using a range of other media such as 'Prezi' an interactive modern presentation creator and also a filmed evaluation.
Our Final Video
In the next post is our final video for our movie opening. I think its worked very well and we have actually produced something much better than we expected to at first. My following posts will mainly be evaluating our video. Editing took a lot of time along with the reshoots and often pointless trips out filming. Although our target was to get as close to a big 6 production as possible and our smooth editing along with clever use of lighting and sound effects makes our video successful.
‘Cross media convergence and synergy are vital processes in the successful marketing of media to audiences’ to what extent do you agree with this statement? (50 marks)
In this essay I will express my
opinion on whether convergence and synergy across media is actually vital and
not just important. Convergence describes two phenomena, firstly involves
technologies coming together for example, mobile devices having the internet
installed, and also media industries diversifying, for example adverts or
trailers for movies appearing on social media websites such as Facebook.
Synergy is the promotion or sale of a product or media text via various subsidiaries,
also how a company advertises and commonly in film includes two major companies
coming together to create a high budget, prone to succeed, film.
Cross media convergence and synergy are important marketing practice for
frontloading the films marketing campaign, as seen with Harry Potter produced
by Warner brothers which has played a huge part to children’s lives, and have
shown highly successful strategies of synergy, for example, play figures and a
whole section of Universal studios theme park in Florida called ‘The Wizarding World of Harry Potter’,
this shows that if done well cross convergence and synergy can be a key role in
profitability of a film.
Two contrasting films I have studied are ’12 years a slave’ produced by
a number of individuals and has small production companies, and ‘The Hobbit:
The desolation of Smaug’ produced by Peter Jackson. There are clear differences
between both, for example, 12 years a slaves budget was $22 million whereas The
Hobbit was budgeted to $250 million, which is classic of a production from one
of ‘the big six’, in this case once again Warner brothers with many
subsidiaries such as warner bros studios. The convergence of subsidiaries and
companies allows them to set high budgets and use a larger range of methods of
synergy such as video games and soundtracks. The hobbit was always deemed to be
successful due to its links with ‘The lord of the rings’ and therefore its
cemented pre-existing fan base, let alone the fact it was part of a trilogy and
had fans of the book prepared to see the movie also.
Warner brothers (produced the hobbit) holds the largest market share in
the production industry with 19.7%, which is higher than any of the remaining
‘big six’ e.g Disney and Paramount. On the other hand, 12 years a slave was
produced by small;l companies such as regency enterprises and was in
association with film 4, non of which are in the big six. This meant they had a
lower budget and probably let synergy strategies, especially seen as the movie
was firstly only marketed as an art house theatre production, which ended up
being hugely successful, grossing up to $56 million.
Synergy worked well for both films but The hobbit was more on a mass
scale of public marketing. 12 years a slave was firstly released in cinemas
producing business for companies such as Odeon and Vue and and food concession
companies. After this stage the book was once again released to show links with
the film, then the audio books on software such as audible and iTunes. The
novel was republished with a cover taken from the movie. This is a clever
strategy for synergy as fans would be prompted to buy both versions, maybe for
collecting reasons or just because they want everything to do with the movie. A
DVD was released along with a soundtrack and then the rights were given to
Amazon prime to showcase the movie to membership holders, all increasing the
movies profitability and range of marketing methods. In this case it seems that
synergy and convergence really may of played a huge part to 12 years a slave’s
success as it slowly built up larger concepts of synergy which unexpectedly saw
the movie turn-over and gross basically double their starting budget.
In contrast, the hobbit’s release was major, everywhere you went you’d
see advertisements, trailers, posters, radio adverts etc. They used traditional
advertising such as billboards and using Warner brothers other movies to attract
them to the hobbit which was at that point ‘coming soon’. The movie followed a
number of the same steps as 12 years a slave, although before release it
already had a huge expected success due to its pre-existing fan base and hugely
successful novel. When released at the cinema queues flooded all cinemas and in
the first weekend it grossed $73.5 million, almost a third of its budget
therefore was paid back in the first weekend of release. When the film was
released in December 2013, the book was also released with a number of
different covers attracting top fans to buy them all therefore improving
marketing of the movie and also book, example of synergy and also convergence.
The hobbit also released soundtracks and eventually gave rights to Netflix , which
is a huge movie showcasing website/app in comparison to amazon prime, which
also represents the contrasts between the two movies’ production, marketing and
distribution. As the production was underway, the movie was still making money
via other methods such as play figures and costumes, being sold in outlets such
as ‘toys r us’ and ‘wal-mart/asda’ and other merchandise such as clothing sold
in outlets such as HMV, these are methods of cross media synergy which 12 years
a slave never used, The hobbit gained interest of the public also by using
different medias, such as their Facebook page, where all you needed to do was
like the page and that gave you access to all the sneak peeks, behind the
scenes and pre-release information about the exciting release.
The use of social media is an example of a pull media strategy, letting
the ‘active’ audience view and like what they wish and take from the media what
they would want instead of getting choices and ideas pushed at them , such as
the hypodermic needle model which indicates audiences get injected with the
medias ideas for example, Katy Perry’s- part of me video, about female marines.
Marketing of a movie is
very important in comparison with success. There’s free marketing techniques
such as networking, community work, social media and email and also paid
marketing such as advertising on billboards and sponsorships. Depending on how
high the budget is or how successful initiates how many different marketing
techniques are used. The hobbit pulled out all the stocks with marketing in
every way possible because simply, warner brothers have the resources and money
to do so, whereas 12 years a slave particularly stuck to in cinema
advertisements or online, without the help of outlet stores selling merchandise
for the upcoming film, like the hobbit.
In conclusion I do
believe that synergy and convergence is highly important to success of a films
marketing although I don’t believe it is essentially vital, although it does
have a huge impact on profit for a film, in this case, 12 years a slave turned
over $53 million and the hobbit made $960.5
million clearly showing that large marketing techniques via synergy and
convergence improves the chances of a films income increasing, although it’s
not actually vital for the success of a film and its marketing.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)

